Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
task
large_string
prompt
large_string
answer
large_string
metadata
large_string
cot
large_string
level
int64
mode
large_string
combinatorics_formula_selection
Which expression counts the outcomes? Answer A-D. C(n,k): unordered; P(n,k): ordered. Problem: Walk east or north from (0,0) to (7,8), stopping at (3,5) on the way. Count the routes. Options: A. C(8,3)*C(6,4) B. C(8,3)*C(7,4) C. C(15,7) D. C(7,3)*C(7,4)
B
{"family": "path_through_point", "structural_depth": 2, "program_type": "ThroughPointPath", "program": {"right": 7, "up": 8, "point_right": 3, "point_up": 5}, "correct_expression": "C(8,3)*C(7,4)", "correct_option_index": 1, "correct_features": {"top_operator": "product", "ast_size": 7, "contains_combination": true, "c...
null
0
instruct
code_execution
Predict the value returned by this Python call. ```python def f0(j: int, n: int) -> int: j = 4 j = 6 + 4 while n > -3: print(j) n = n - 2 return n + j def f1(d: str) -> int: a = [y % 4 for y in range(5, 10)] return 0 def f2(b: int) -> list: b = (b if b != b else 0) - 1 b ...
7
{"code": "def f0(j: int, n: int) -> int:\n j = 4\n j = 6 + 4\n while n > -3:\n print(j)\n n = n - 2\n return n + j\ndef f1(d: str) -> int:\n a = [y % 4 for y in range(5, 10)]\n return 0\ndef f2(b: int) -> list:\n b = (b if b != b else 0) - 1\n b = f\"val={b}\" + f\"x={b}\"\n ret...
null
2
instruct
metamath_entailment
Does the conjecture follow using only the listed premises and rules? Rules instantiate only by renaming variables. The answer is True or False. Premises: 1. ctx => P2(x, D1) 2. P3(y, x) 3. ctx => P3(y, z) 4. P3(u, z) 5. ctx => P3(x, z) Allowed Rules: r1: P3(u, z); ctx => P3(u, y); ctx => P3(z, x) ==> ctx => P3(y, x) ...
False
{"premises": ["ctx => P2(x, D1)", "P3(y, x)", "ctx => P3(y, z)", "P3(u, z)", "ctx => P3(x, z)"], "raw_premises": [["|-", "(", "ph", "->", "D", "e.", "RR", ")"], ["|-", "C", "=", "D"], ["|-", "(", "ph", "->", "C", "=", "B", ")"], ["|-", "A", "=", "B"], ["|-", "(", "ph", "->", "D", "=", "B", ")"]], "rules": ["r1", "r2", ...
null
0
instruct
analogical_case_matching
Which case matches Query under consistent entity/relation renaming and per-relation direction reversal? Answer with its ID, or None. M0: a alpha c, a alpha f, d beta c, b gamma f, e gamma f M1: c alpha b, f beta a, f beta b, f beta d, f gamma d M2: e alpha a, e alpha c, f alpha d, a beta c, f gamma b M3: f alpha c, d ...
M0
{"cases": [{"id": "M0", "context": [["alpha", "a", "c"], ["alpha", "a", "f"], ["beta", "d", "c"], ["gamma", "b", "f"], ["gamma", "e", "f"]], "consequence": ["gamma", "a", "d"]}, {"id": "M1", "context": [["alpha", "c", "b"], ["beta", "f", "a"], ["beta", "f", "b"], ["beta", "f", "d"], ["gamma", "f", "d"]], "consequence":...
null
2
instruct
rewrite_system
Normalize by the ordered rewrite rules. At each step, scan subterm positions outermost-first and left-to-right. Stop at the first position matched by at least one rule, then apply the earliest matching rule in the listed order (position priority first; rule priority second). Rules: - const(X,Y) -> X - fst(pair(X,Y)) -...
No
{"theory": "ast", "rules": "- const(X,Y) -> X\n- fst(pair(X,Y)) -> X\n- snd(pair(X,Y)) -> Y\n- if(true,X,Y) -> X\n- let(unit,X) -> X\n- if(false,X,Y) -> Y\n- id(X) -> X", "term": "if(id(id(id(false))),true,true)", "normal_form": "true", "used": ["id", "id", "id", "if_false"], "cot": "-> if(id(id(false)),true,true)\n-> ...
null
1
verification
multistep_nli
Premise: clara is a parent of bruno. bruno is a parent of elena. elena is a parent of farah. alice is not patient. bruno is careful. bruno is kind. For all x, y, if x is a parent of y, then x is an ancestor of y. For all x, y, z, if x is a parent of y and y is an ancestor of z, then x is an ancestor of z. From p is a p...
Yes
{"premise": ["clara is a parent of bruno.", "bruno is a parent of elena.", "elena is a parent of farah.", "alice is not patient.", "bruno is careful.", "bruno is kind.", "For all x, y, if x is a parent of y, then x is an ancestor of y.", "For all x, y, z, if x is a parent of y and y is an ancestor of z, then x is an an...
null
2
instruct
table_qa
Execute this SQL query on the table named dataframe: Table 1: {"date": "25 janv. 2025", "qty": "2", "row_id": "R0000", "unit_price": "39.62", "country": "Germany", "status": "paid", "category": "Clothing"} {"date": "4 mai 2026", "qty": "5", "row_id": "R0001", "unit_price": "53.63", "country": "France", "status": "paid...
Electronics
{"table": "{\"date\": \"25 janv. 2025\", \"qty\": \"2\", \"row_id\": \"R0000\", \"unit_price\": \"39.62\", \"country\": \"Germany\", \"status\": \"paid\", \"category\": \"Clothing\"}\n{\"date\": \"4 mai 2026\", \"qty\": \"5\", \"row_id\": \"R0001\", \"unit_price\": \"53.63\", \"country\": \"France\", \"status\": \"paid...
null
2
instruct
parsing_derivation
(START) start (GRAMMAR) R0: seq -> expr seq R1: expr -> '<' seq '>' R2: start -> seq R3: seq -> R4: expr -> '(' seq ')' R5: expr -> '[' seq ']' (STRING) ( ) ( ) (QUESTION) The answer is the rule labels used in the leftmost derivation of STRING, in order, separated by spaces.
R2 R0 R4 R3 R0 R4 R3 R3
{"label": "unambiguous", "tokens": ["(", ")", "(", ")"], "g": "seq -> \nexpr -> '(' seq ')'\nseq -> expr seq\nstart -> seq\nexpr -> '[' seq ']'\nexpr -> '<' seq '>'", "start": "start", "labeled_g": "R0: seq -> expr seq\nR1: expr -> '<' seq '>'\nR2: start -> seq\nR3: seq -> \nR4: expr -> '(' seq ')'\nR5: expr -> '[' seq...
null
0
instruct
table_equivalence
Do these tables contain the same data? Ignore row order, column order, and table syntax; match values by column name. Treat numeric grouping and trailing zeros as formatting, ISO and English month-name dates as dates, and — and NULL as missing. Repeated rows count. Table A: event_date,amount,qty 2025-07-23,576.73,394 ...
Yes
{"table_a": "event_date,amount,qty\n2025-07-23,576.73,394\n\u2014,427.63,717\n2024-11-13,1586.21,597\n2025-03-28,593.88,949\n", "table_b": "amount|qty|event_date\n593.88|949.00|Mar 28, 2025\n1,586.21|597.00|Nov 13, 2024\n576.73|394.00|Jul 23, 2025\n427.63|717.00|NULL\n", "format_a": "to_csv", "format_b": "to_pipe", "mu...
null
0
instruct
qualitative_causal_reasoning
Assume linear causal relations, independent noise, and no exact cancellations. X10 directly decreases X2; X12 directly decreases X8; X13 directly decreases X1; X3 directly decreases X11; X4 directly increases X9; X5 directly increases X6; X5 directly increases X7; X6 directly increases X1; X6 directly decreases X12. ...
no_effect
{"edges": [["X10", "X2", "-"], ["X12", "X8", "-"], ["X13", "X1", "-"], ["X3", "X11", "-"], ["X4", "X9", "+"], ["X5", "X6", "+"], ["X5", "X7", "+"], ["X6", "X1", "+"], ["X6", "X12", "-"]], "nodes": ["X0", "X1", "X10", "X11", "X12", "X13", "X2", "X3", "X4", "X5", "X6", "X7", "X8", "X9"], "query": {"kind": "intervention",...
null
1
instruct
regex_following
The answer is the shortest non-empty visible non-whitespace ASCII string that fully matches this regular expression, with lexicographic tie-breaks: \].*?
]
{"regex": "\\].*?", "string": "]", "_time": 0.005178213119506836, "_task": "regex_following", "_level": 2, "_config": {"level": 2, "seed": null, "size": null, "n_ex": 10, "max_depth": 7, "min_depth": 5, "n_alpha": 4, "max_answer_len": 24, "max_synth_nodes": 200000, "require_unique": true}, "_prompt_tokens": 32, "_answe...
null
2
instruct
unification_entailment
Compute a most general unifier of the equations. Apply it to both sides of the candidate equality. Answer Yes if the instantiated candidate terms are identical, otherwise answer No. The equations are guaranteed to be unifiable. Equations: - p(x1, c) = p(x1, x0) Candidate: c = x0
Yes
{"answer": "Yes", "equations": ["p(x1, c) = p(x1, x0)"], "candidate": "c = x0", "num_equations": 1, "num_variables": 2, "num_bindings_in_mgu": 1, "max_term_depth": 1, "candidate_depth": 0, "trace_steps": 2, "num_decompositions": 1, "num_alias_bindings": 0, "num_sharing_constraints": 0, "num_redundant_equations": 0, "di...
null
0
instruct
grid_navigation
Grid [0,4]x[0,4], N=+y, E=+x. Initial Facts: - B is above C. - B is right of C. - B starts at (4, 3). - A is above C. - A is below B. - B is right of A. - A starts at (0, 2). - C is right of A. Steps: 1. B and C swap positions. What is the final Manhattan distance between A and C? The answer is an integer.
5
{"answer_type": "distance", "query_a": "A", "query_b": "C", "grid": 4, "objects": ["A", "B", "C"], "facts": [{"k": "v", "a": "B", "b": "C", "r": "above"}, {"k": "h", "a": "B", "b": "C", "r": "right"}, {"k": "coord", "a": "B", "p": [4, 3]}, {"k": "v", "a": "A", "b": "C", "r": "above"}, {"k": "v", "a": "A", "b": "B", "r"...
null
0
instruct
graph_successors
For each query (x, k), give the k-th successor of x by following directed edges k times. Answer with space-separated integers in query order. Graph: Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [1], 1: [0], 2: [4], 3: [3], 4: [5], 5: [2]} Queries: [(4, 1)]
5
{"graph_description": "Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [1], 1: [0], 2: [4], 3: [3], 4: [5], 5: [2]}", "queries": [[4, 1]], "payload": {"graph": "Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [1], 1: [0], 2: [4], 3: [3], 4: [5], 5: [2]}", "queries": "[(4, 1)]"}, "nodes": [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5], "edges": [[0, 1...
null
0
instruct
game_best_move
In this graph game, choose player's best move. Player chooses on player turns; opponent chooses on opponent turns. Opponent minimizes player score. Start: n3. Turns alternate player, opponent. Move along one edge per turn, for at most 3 moves. Play ends upon reaching a leaf or the move horizon; in either case, player'...
n4
{"rules": "role(player).\nrole(opponent).\ninit(at(n3)).\ninit(step(t0)).\ninit(control(player)).\nsucc(t0,t1). succ(t1,t2). succ(t2,t3).\nedge(n0,n4). edge(n1,n3). edge(n1,n4). edge(n1,n8). edge(n2,n6). edge(n2,n8). edge(n3,n4). edge(n3,n6). edge(n4,n7). edge(n5,n6). edge(n5,n7). edge(n5,n8).\nleaf(n6). leaf(n7). leaf...
null
2
instruct
most_probable_evidence
Factor c is independently true with probability 0.4. Factor f is independently true with probability 0.7. Factor e is independently true with probability 0.7. The observation holds exactly when ((factor c or factor f) holds and factor e is false). We observe it. Which hidden fact values form the most probable complete ...
1 3 4
{"problog": "0.4::c.\n0.7::f.\n0.7::e.\nobserved :- ((c;f),\\+e).\nevidence(observed,true).", "english": "Factor c is independently true with probability 0.4.\nFactor f is independently true with probability 0.7.\nFactor e is independently true with probability 0.7.\nThe observation holds exactly when ((factor c or fac...
null
1
instruct
lambda_reduction
Reduce the following untyped λ-term to β-normal form. Syntax: `\x.body` is λx.body; juxtaposition is left-associative application; free identifiers are constants. Term: ((d (\v0.((((\_1.d) (b c)) ((v0 ((\_3.(d ((\_6._6) (((\_5._5) ((((\_8.(\_7._8)) v0) a) v0)) _3)))) (v0 ((\_0._0) (v0 ((\_4.v0) c)))))) ((\_2.v0) d))) ...
Yes
{"term": "((d (\\v0.((((\\_1.d) (b c)) ((v0 ((\\_3.(d ((\\_6._6) (((\\_5._5) ((((\\_8.(\\_7._8)) v0) a) v0)) _3)))) (v0 ((\\_0._0) (v0 ((\\_4.v0) c)))))) ((\\_2.v0) d))) v0))) a)", "normal_form": "((d (\\x0.((d ((x0 (d ((x0 x0) (x0 (x0 x0))))) x0)) x0))) a)", "beta_steps": 9, "has_shadowing": false, "shadowing": 0, "ca...
null
3
verification
set_missing_element
Answer with the missing elements in the ordered span of [198, 190, 187, 193, 197, 182, 199, 194, 180, 186, 183, 188, 192, 191, 185, 181, 196] as a Python set.
{184, 189, 195}
{"element_list": [198, 190, 187, 193, 197, 182, 199, 194, 180, 186, 183, 188, 192, 191, 185, 181, 196], "missing_count": 3, "_time": 0.0004031658172607422, "_task": "set_missing_element", "_level": 3, "_config": {"level": 3, "seed": null, "size": null, "domain_size": 675, "set_size": 20, "n_domains": 5, "prob_no_missin...
null
3
instruct
defeasible_nli
An `unless` condition must be shown to block its rule. Facts: Elena is alpha-tagged and foxtrot-tagged. David is alpha-tagged, bravo-tagged, foxtrot-tagged, gamma-tagged, and lambda-tagged. Alice is delta-tagged and bravo-tagged. Clara is echo-tagged. Bruno is gamma-tagged. Elena is alpha-linked to David. Rules: Alph...
No
{"premise": ["Elena is alpha tagged.", "David is alpha tagged.", "David is bravo tagged.", "Elena is foxtrot tagged.", "David is foxtrot tagged.", "David is gamma tagged.", "Elena is alpha-linked to David.", "David is lambda tagged.", "Alice is delta tagged.", "Clara is echo tagged.", "Bruno is gamma tagged.", "Alice i...
null
1
instruct
game_forced_win
In this graph game, decide whether player can force a win. Player chooses on player turns; opponent chooses on opponent turns. Opponent minimizes player score. A win means final player score is greater than 50. Start: n1. Turns alternate player, opponent. Move along one edge per turn, for at most 3 moves. Play ends up...
Yes
{"rules": "role(player).\nrole(opponent).\ninit(at(n1)).\ninit(step(t0)).\ninit(control(player)).\nsucc(t0,t1). succ(t1,t2). succ(t2,t3).\nedge(n0,n2). edge(n0,n3). edge(n1,n2). edge(n1,n4). edge(n2,n3). edge(n3,n5). edge(n3,n6).\nleaf(n4). leaf(n5). leaf(n6).\nvalue(n0,40). value(n1,0). value(n2,40). value(n3,40). val...
null
0
verification
graph_successors
For each query (x, k), give the k-th successor of x by following directed edges k times. Answer with space-separated integers in query order. Graph: Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [7], 1: [2], 2: [3], 3: [1], 4: [6], 5: [0], 6: [5], 7: [4]} Queries: [(4, 4), (1, 1)]
7 2
{"graph_description": "Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [7], 1: [2], 2: [3], 3: [1], 4: [6], 5: [0], 6: [5], 7: [4]}", "queries": [[4, 4], [1, 1]], "payload": {"graph": "Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [7], 1: [2], 2: [3], 3: [1], 4: [6], 5: [0], 6: [5], 7: [4]}", "queries": "[(4, 4), (1, 1)]...
null
2
instruct
math_word_problem
Hana has 3 times as many tiles as Zara. Nina has 2 times as many tiles as Hana. Carlos has half as many tiles as Hana. Mei has half as many tiles as Zara. Diego has a quarter as many tiles as Mei. Mei has 24 tiles. How many tiles does Diego have? Answer with a number.
6
{"family": "relational", "unit": "tiles", "names": ["Zara", "Hana", "Carlos", "Mei", "Nina", "Diego"], "relations": [["times", "Hana", "Zara", 3, null], ["times", "Nina", "Hana", 2, null], ["frac", "Carlos", "Hana", 2, null], ["frac", "Mei", "Zara", 2, null], ["frac", "Diego", "Mei", 4, null]], "given": "Mei", "asked":...
null
4
instruct
qualitative_reasoning
There are 6 entities labeled 0 through 5. Read 'i rel j' as 'entity i is rel to entity j'. Facts: - 3 finished-by 5 - 2 after 5 - 0 finished-by 2 - 4 meets 0 - 1 overlapped-by 3 - 1 contains 5 - 0 overlapped-by 1 - 4 equals 5 What is the relation of the vertical extent of box 1 to that of box 4? The answer is exactly ...
contains
{"calculus": "allen_y", "topic": "vertical extents of 2D boxes", "phrasing": "the relation of the vertical extent of box {i} to that of box {j}", "n_entities": 6, "hops": 5, "n_revealed": 8, "entities": [[-3, 2, 1, 3], [-1, 2, -1, 2], [-2, 3, 2, 3], [0, 2, -3, 1], [-3, -2, 0, 1], [1, 3, 0, 1]], "revealed": [[3, 5, "fin...
null
1
instruct
syntax_error_detection
(START) start (GRAMMAR) decl_simple -> there are det_pl_indef n_pl det_pl_indef -> 'some' discourse -> decl decl -> decl_simple are -> 'are' there -> 'there' n_pl -> 'scientists' start -> root root -> discourse '.' (STRING) there are some scientists some Answer OK, INCOMPLETE, or ERROR token for the first invalid to...
ERROR some@2
{"g": "decl_simple -> there are det_pl_indef n_pl\ndet_pl_indef -> 'some'\ndiscourse -> decl\ndecl -> decl_simple\nare -> 'are'\nthere -> 'there'\nn_pl -> 'scientists'\nstart -> root\nroot -> discourse '.'", "start": "start", "tokens": ["there", "are", "some", "scientists", "some"], "error_index": 4, "_time": 0.1059179...
null
0
instruct
string_transduction
String: cbbcbabcad Operations: - replace a with d - caesar shift by 3 - dedupe adjacent repeats Answer with the final string.
fefegefg
{"mode": "program", "source": "cbbcbabcad", "ops": ["replace a with d", "caesar shift by 3", "dedupe adjacent repeats"], "noop_rate": 0.0, "exclude_spaces": false, "_time": 0.0006940364837646484, "_task": "string_transduction", "_level": 1, "_config": {"level": 1, "seed": null, "size": null, "length": 10, "n_ops": 3, "...
null
1
instruct
code_analysis
Program: ```python import random mode, status = 'done', 'green' def step(): global mode, status status = random.choice(['green', 'red', 'amber', 'blue']) if (mode != 'fail') and (mode == 'wait'): status = random.choice(['green', 'red', 'amber', 'blue']) else: match status: ...
[('done', 'green'), ('idle', 'amber'), ('wait', 'blue')]
{"program": "import random\n\nmode, status = 'done', 'green'\n\ndef step():\n global mode, status\n status = random.choice(['green', 'red', 'amber', 'blue'])\n if (mode != 'fail') and (mode == 'wait'):\n status = random.choice(['green', 'red', 'amber', 'blue'])\n else:\n match status:\n ...
null
1
instruct
table_equivalence
Do these tables contain the same data? Ignore row order, column order, and table syntax; match values by column name. Treat numeric grouping and trailing zeros as formatting, ISO and English month-name dates as dates, and — and NULL as missing. Repeated rows count. Table A: event_date,amount,qty 2025-07-23,576.73,394 ...
Yes
{"table_a": "event_date amount company\nAug 12, 2025 1,742.47 NULL\nMay 21, 2026 344.17 Smith, Taylor and Jordan\nDec 30, 2024 1,367.22 Bennett and Sons\nDec 30, 2024 1,367.22 Bennett and Sons", "table_b": "event_date: 2024-12-30; company: Bennett and Sons; amount: 1367.22\nevent_date: 2025-08-12; compa...
null
0
few_shot
graph_successors
For each query (x, k), give the k-th successor of x by following directed edges k times. Answer with space-separated integers in query order. Graph: Nodes [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] and directed edges: (0, 4), (1, 6), (2, 7), (3, 1), (4, 2), (5, 0), (6, 5), (7, 3). Queries: [(2, 3), (0, 4)]
1 3
{"graph_description": "Nodes [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] and directed edges: (0, 4), (1, 6), (2, 7), (3, 1), (4, 2), (5, 0), (6, 5), (7, 3).", "queries": [[2, 3], [0, 4]], "payload": {"graph": "Nodes [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] and directed edges: (0, 4), (1, 6), (2, 7), (3, 1), (4, 2), (5, 0), (6, 5), (7, 3).", "queries": "...
null
2
instruct
code_runnability
Predict whether this Python call runs successfully or raises an exception. ```python def f0(f: int, q: list) -> list: f = f1(q, "cat") // f return q def f1(f: list, z: str) -> int: a = f2(2) + f2(0) return 0 def f2(i: int) -> str: print(i) return "" def endpoint(x0: int, x1: list) -> list: r...
ZeroDivisionError
{"code": "def f0(f: int, q: list) -> list:\n f = f1(q, \"cat\") // f\n return q\ndef f1(f: list, z: str) -> int:\n a = f2(2) + f2(0)\n return 0\ndef f2(i: int) -> str:\n print(i)\n return \"\"\ndef endpoint(x0: int, x1: list) -> list:\n return f0(x0, x1)\n", "args": [0, [1]], "call": "endpoint(0, [...
null
2
instruct
graph_pathfinding
Find the shortest directed path from node 5 to node 0. If several paths are tied, return the lexicographically smallest one. Answer with space-separated nodes, or `None` if no path exists. Graph: Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [1, 3], 1: [2, 5], 2: [0, 1, 3, 4], 3: [0, 2, 4, 5], 4: [1, 3, 5], 5: [0, 3]}
5 0
{"weighted": false, "graph_description": "Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [1, 3], 1: [2, 5], 2: [0, 1, 3, 4], 3: [0, 2, 4, 5], 4: [1, 3, 5], 5: [0, 3]}", "start_node": 5, "end_node": 0, "payload": {"graph": "Adjacency Dictionary (source to targets): {0: [1, 3], 1: [2, 5], 2: [0, 1, 3, 4], 3: [0, 2, 4, 5],...
null
0
instruct
graph_successors
For each query (x, k), give the k-th successor of x by following directed edges k times. Answer with space-separated integers in query order. Graph: Directed Edges: 0->7, 1->4, 2->2, 3->8, 4->6, 5->0, 6->1, 7->3, 8->5 Queries: [(8, 4), (8, 3), (1, 4)]
3 7 4
{"graph_description": "Directed Edges: 0->7, 1->4, 2->2, 3->8, 4->6, 5->0, 6->1, 7->3, 8->5", "queries": [[8, 4], [8, 3], [1, 4]], "payload": {"graph": "Directed Edges: 0->7, 1->4, 2->2, 3->8, 4->6, 5->0, 6->1, 7->3, 8->5", "queries": "[(8, 4), (8, 3), (1, 4)]"}, "nodes": [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], "edges": [[0, 7], ...
null
3
instruct
set_missing_element
Answer with the missing elements in the ordered span of ['2021-05-18', '2021-05-17', '2021-05-16', '2021-05-19', '2021-05-11', '2021-05-15', '2021-05-13', '2021-05-12', '2021-05-14'] as a Python set.
{}
{"element_list": ["2021-05-18", "2021-05-17", "2021-05-16", "2021-05-19", "2021-05-11", "2021-05-15", "2021-05-13", "2021-05-12", "2021-05-14"], "missing_count": 0, "_time": 0.00035500526428222656, "_task": "set_missing_element", "_level": 1, "_config": {"level": 1, "seed": null, "size": null, "domain_size": 300, "set_...
null
1
instruct
planar_geometry_relations
Given points: C=(-8, 5); D=(11, -6); G=(8, -11/2); H=(-8, -6); M=(8, 1); N=(1, -2); V=(8, 2); Y=(-6, 2). Definitions: S is the translation of H by vector NV. K is the projection of V onto line NS. A is the translation of S by vector KV. T is the translation of K by vector YA. Question: What type of angle is angle DGK? ...
obtuse
{"points": {"C": "(-8, 5)", "D": "(11, -6)", "G": "(8, -11/2)", "H": "(-8, -6)", "M": "(8, 1)", "N": "(1, -2)", "V": "(8, 2)", "Y": "(-6, 2)"}, "definitions": ["S is the translation of H by vector NV.", "K is the projection of V onto line NS.", "A is the translation of S by vector KV.", "T is the translation of K by ve...
null
2
instruct
regex_reasoning
A = a|c|c? B = b?|bbb Do A and B accept exactly the same set of strings? The answer is Yes or No.
No
{"qtype": "equivalence", "regex_a": "a|c|c?", "regex_b": "b?|bbb", "_time": 0.009298086166381836, "_task": "regex_reasoning", "_level": 0, "_config": {"level": 0, "seed": null, "size": null, "max_depth": 4, "min_depth": 2, "n_alpha": 3, "gramforge_algorithm": "sequential"}, "_prompt_tokens": 33, "_answer_tokens": 1, "_...
null
0
instruct
sequential_induction
Infer U[n]. Max recurrence degree: 0. Ops: +, -, *. Use n. Give the simplified polynomial RHS. Sequence: [1, 5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 131, 155, 181, 209] The answer is the RHS only.
n**2 + 3 * n + 1
{"first elements": [1, 5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 131, 155, 181, 209], "degree of recursion": 0, "initial terms": [], "canonical cost": 7, "canonical max cost": 7, "_time": 0.06991958618164062, "_task": "sequential_induction", "_level": 3, "_config": {"level": 3, "seed": null, "size": null, "mode": "simple", "...
null
3
instruct
multistep_abduction
Premise: [0] clara is approved. [1] alice is careful. [2] Being approved implies being active. [3] From x is active, it follows that x is not trained. Hypothesis: david is trained. Candidate Facts: [0] david is approved. [1] david is trained. [2] david is not approved. [3] clara is active. [4] alice is approved. [5] ...
0
{"premise": ["clara is approved.", "alice is careful.", "Being approved implies being active.", "From x is active, it follows that x is not trained."], "hypothesis": "david is trained.", "candidates": ["david is approved.", "david is trained.", "david is not approved.", "clara is active.", "alice is approved.", "alice ...
null
0
instruct
analogical_case_matching
Which case matches Query under consistent entity/relation renaming and per-relation direction reversal? Answer with its ID. M0: e alpha c, d beta e, a gamma b, e gamma d M1: e alpha d, b beta a, c beta b, d beta a M2: e alpha a, e alpha b, d beta a, e gamma d M3: a alpha c, a beta c, d gamma a, d gamma c Query: y delt...
M0
{"cases": [{"id": "M0", "context": [["alpha", "e", "c"], ["beta", "d", "e"], ["gamma", "a", "b"], ["gamma", "e", "d"]], "consequence": ["gamma", "d", "e"]}, {"id": "M1", "context": [["alpha", "e", "d"], ["beta", "b", "a"], ["beta", "c", "b"], ["beta", "d", "a"]], "consequence": ["beta", "a", "d"]}, {"id": "M2", "contex...
null
1
instruct
most_probable_outcome
A jar contains 9 green marbles and 6 yellow marbles. Two marbles are picked without replacing the first marble. Which statement is more likely? A: at least one selected marble is green. B: both selected marbles are yellow. The answer is exactly one of: A, B, equal.
A
{"problog": "0.6::d1_x; 0.4::d1_y.\n0.571428571429::d2_x; 0.428571428571::d2_y :- d1_x.\n0.642857142857::d2_x; 0.357142857143::d2_y :- d1_y.\na :- d1_x.\na :- d2_x.\nb :- d1_y, d2_y.\nquery(a).\nquery(b).", "english": "A jar contains 9 green marbles and 6 yellow marbles.\nTwo marbles are picked without replacing the fi...
null
4
instruct
parsing_derivation
(START) start (GRAMMAR) R0: does -> 'does' R1: wh_obj -> 'what' R2: np_sg_subj -> pro_sg_subj R3: question -> wh_obj does np_sg_subj v_trans_base R4: root -> question '?' R5: start -> root R6: v_trans_base -> 'like' R7: pro_sg_subj -> 'she' (STRING) what does she like ? (QUESTION) The answer is the rule labels used ...
R5 R4 R3 R1 R0 R2 R7 R6
{"label": "unambiguous", "tokens": ["what", "does", "she", "like", "?"], "g": "question -> wh_obj does np_sg_subj v_trans_base\ndoes -> 'does'\nwh_obj -> 'what'\npro_sg_subj -> 'she'\nv_trans_base -> 'like'\nroot -> question '?'\nnp_sg_subj -> pro_sg_subj\nstart -> root", "start": "start", "labeled_g": "R0: does -> 'do...
null
2
instruct
grid_navigation
Grid [0,7]x[0,7], N=+y, E=+x. Initial Facts: - D is below B. - D starts at (3, 2). - E is right of F. - A is above D. - D is above E. - B is right of A. - F starts at (1, 5). - B is right of F. - C is below F. - E is below F. - C is left of B. Steps: 1. E jumps to A's position offset by (-1, 0). 2. F jumps to B's posi...
Yes
{"answer_type": "distance", "query_a": "A", "query_b": "C", "grid": 7, "objects": ["A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F"], "facts": [{"k": "v", "a": "D", "b": "B", "r": "below"}, {"k": "coord", "a": "D", "p": [3, 2]}, {"k": "h", "a": "E", "b": "F", "r": "right"}, {"k": "v", "a": "A", "b": "D", "r": "above"}, {"k": "v", "a": "D"...
null
3
verification
constraint_satisfaction
In this 5x5 grid, each row and column contains 1..5 once. Constraints: 1. r1c3 < r1c4 2. r4c3 < r4c2 3. r5c5 != 1 4. r2c1 = 5 5. r4c4 = 1 6. r4c1 < r5c1 7. r3c3 < r4c3 Question: What is r5c2? Answer with one name or integer.
1
{"model_mode": "grid", "family": "grid", "solve_mode": "query", "query_type": "scalar", "structure_mode": null, "query": [5, 2], "query_var": "r5c2", "clues": ["r1c3 < r1c4", "r4c3 < r4c2", "r5c5 != 1", "r2c1 = 5", "r4c4 = 1", "r4c1 < r5c1", "r3c3 < r4c3"], "constraints": ["r1c3 < r1c4", "r4c3 < r4c2", "r5c5 != 1", "r2...
null
3
instruct
code_execution
Predict the value returned by this Python call. ```python def f0(a: str) -> list: a = f1(4, [0, 1, 2]) return [] def f1(z: int, u: list) -> str: if z > z: z = z + 1 pass return "" def endpoint(x0: str) -> list: return f0(x0) ``` Call: `endpoint('cyz')` The answer is the exact Python `re...
[]
{"code": "def f0(a: str) -> list:\n a = f1(4, [0, 1, 2])\n return []\ndef f1(z: int, u: list) -> str:\n if z > z:\n z = z + 1\n pass\n return \"\"\ndef endpoint(x0: str) -> list:\n return f0(x0)\n", "args": ["cyz"], "call": "endpoint('cyz')", "steps": 6, "elapsed": 0.0013944140009698458, "stdou...
null
1
instruct
combinatorics_formula_selection
Which expression counts the outcomes? Answer A-D. C(n,k): unordered; P(n,k): ordered. Problem: Choose exactly one item from disjoint groups of sizes 9 and 7. Options: A. 9*7 B. 9+7 C. 2*9*7 D. 9+7-1
B
{"family": "sum_rule", "structural_depth": 1, "program_type": "ChoiceRule", "program": {"kind": "sum", "first": 9, "second": 7}, "correct_expression": "9+7", "correct_option_index": 1, "correct_features": {"top_operator": "sum", "ast_size": 3, "contains_combination": false, "contains_permutation": false, "contains_powe...
null
2
instruct
logic_nli
Premise: Roger is the only person in the room. if “Bellbridge's houses are all purple.” then ““The clock tower in Chronos does not strike thirteen times.” or “The lighthouse on Cape Sorrow glows green.” but not both” Jesus is hotel tagged Jesus is bravo tagged no quiet person in the room is quiet The clock tower in Chr...
No
{"verbalize_seed": 396728, "proof": {"proof": "% Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP\n% Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!\n% SZS status Unsatisfiable for tmpmqbujn36\n% SZS output start Proof for tmpmqbujn36\n2. room(roger) & ! [X0] : (room(X0) => X0 = roger) [input(axiom) 0]\n6. ! [X0] : (room(X0) => (quie...
null
0
instruct
code_execution
Predict the value returned by this Python call. ```python def f0(b: list, m: str) -> list: a = 2 try: print(a) except Exception: while a <= 3: b = [k % 3 for k in range(5, 7)] a = a + 2 return b def f1(r: str) -> str: try: pass except Exception: ...
[2]
{"code": "def f0(b: list, m: str) -> list:\n a = 2\n try:\n print(a)\n except Exception:\n while a <= 3:\n b = [k % 3 for k in range(5, 7)]\n a = a + 2\n return b\ndef f1(r: str) -> str:\n try:\n pass\n except Exception:\n b = [w + 2 for w in range(4, ...
null
2
instruct
string_transduction
String: gedcbcggaagcgbcf Operations: - reverse - dedupe adjacent repeats - replace d with c - rotate left by 2 - sort ascending - sort descending Answer with the final string. Answer: ggggfecccccbba Correct? (Yes/No)
Yes
{"mode": "program", "source": "gedcbcggaagcgbcf", "ops": ["reverse", "dedupe adjacent repeats", "replace d with c", "rotate left by 2", "sort ascending", "sort descending"], "noop_rate": 0.0, "exclude_spaces": false, "_time": 0.0014531612396240234, "_task": "string_transduction", "_level": 4, "_config": {"level": 4, "s...
null
4
verification
metamath_entailment
Does the conjecture follow using only the listed premises and rules? Rules instantiate only by renaming variables. The answer is True or False. Premises: 1. ctx => P2(x, D1) 2. ctx => P2(y, D2) 3. ctx => P3(y, C0) Allowed Rules: r1: ctx => P2(x, D3); ctx => P2(y, D3); ctx => P3(y, C0) ==> ctx => P4(F2(F1(y, x), y), x...
True
{"premises": ["ctx => P2(x, D1)", "ctx => P2(y, D2)", "ctx => P3(y, C0)"], "raw_premises": [["|-", "(", "ph", "->", "A", "e.", "NN", ")"], ["|-", "(", "ph", "->", "B", "e.", "NN0", ")"], ["|-", "(", "ph", "->", "B", "=/=", "0", ")"]], "rules": ["r1", "r2", "r3", "r4"], "raw_rule_labels": ["divcan3d", "nn0cnd", "nnzd", ...
null
1
instruct
set_expression
B = {'one', 'thirty', 'thirteen', 'thirty-three', 'forty', 'eighteen', 'forty-three', 'five', 'twenty-one'} C = {'five', 'seven', 'forty-three', 'twenty-three', 'eighteen', 'fourteen', 'forty-seven', 'ten', 'twenty'} Evaluate (C & B).
{'eighteen', 'five', 'forty-three'}
{"expr": "(C & B)", "list_mode": false, "C": ["five", "seven", "forty-three", "twenty-three", "eighteen", "fourteen", "forty-seven", "ten", "twenty"], "B": ["one", "thirty", "thirteen", "thirty-three", "forty", "eighteen", "forty-three", "five", "twenty-one"], "_time": 0.0005443096160888672, "_task": "set_expression", ...
null
1
instruct
reference_tracking
Rules: - Each ball has a positive integer size. - Dock(X, Y) succeeds iff size(X) == size(Y). - If docking fails and the failure sentence says 'it was too large/small', 'it' refers to the larger/smaller of the two docked balls. Inventory: - b1: black - b2: green - b3: black - b4: green - b5: yellow Initial State: -...
No
{"family": "logical_winograd", "balls": ["b1", "b2", "b3", "b4", "b5"], "boxes": ["x1", "x2", "x3", "x4"], "colors": {"b1": "black", "b2": "green", "b3": "black", "b4": "green", "b5": "yellow"}, "initial_placement": {"b1": "x2", "b2": "x1", "b3": "x4", "b4": "x3", "b5": "x4"}, "moves": ["Transfer b4 from x3 into x2.", ...
null
2
verification
parsing_derivation
(START) start (GRAMMAR) R0: seq -> expr seq R1: expr -> '<' seq '>' R2: start -> seq R3: seq -> R4: expr -> '(' seq ')' R5: expr -> '[' seq ']' (STRING) ( ) ( ) (QUESTION) The answer is the rule labels used in the leftmost derivation of STRING, in order, separated by spaces. Answer: R2 R0 R4 R3 R0 R4 R3 R3 (START)...
R2 R4 R0 R1 R4 R3 R1 R4 R5 R1 R1
{"label": "unambiguous", "tokens": ["(", ")", "[", "]", "<", ">"], "g": "seq -> expr seq\nexpr -> '[' seq ']'\nexpr -> '<' seq '>'\nexpr -> '(' seq ')'\nstart -> seq\nseq -> ", "start": "start", "labeled_g": "R0: expr -> '(' seq ')'\nR1: seq -> \nR2: start -> seq\nR3: expr -> '[' seq ']'\nR4: seq -> expr seq\nR5: expr ...
null
3
few_shot
regex_reasoning
A = abac B = (a)ab+ Is every string accepted by A also accepted by B? The answer is Yes or No. Answer: aaddbb Correct? (Yes/No)
No
{"qtype": "containment", "regex_a": "abac", "regex_b": "(a)ab+", "_time": 0.011043071746826172, "_task": "regex_reasoning", "_level": 0, "_config": {"level": 0, "seed": null, "size": null, "max_depth": 4, "min_depth": 2, "n_alpha": 3, "gramforge_algorithm": "sequential"}, "_prompt_tokens": 30, "_answer_tokens": 1, "_ge...
null
0
verification
unification_entailment
Compute a most general unifier of the equations. Apply it to both sides of the candidate equality. Answer Yes if the instantiated candidate terms are identical, otherwise answer No. The equations are guaranteed to be unifiable. Equations: - g(x0) = g(c) Candidate: x0 = g(c)
No
{"answer": "No", "equations": ["g(x0) = g(c)"], "candidate": "x0 = g(c)", "num_equations": 1, "num_variables": 1, "num_bindings_in_mgu": 1, "max_term_depth": 1, "candidate_depth": 1, "trace_steps": 2, "num_decompositions": 1, "num_alias_bindings": 0, "num_sharing_constraints": 0, "num_redundant_equations": 0, "difficul...
null
0
instruct
constrained_continuation
(START) start (GRAMMAR) seq -> expr -> '[' seq ']' expr -> '(' seq ')' expr -> '<' seq '>' seq -> expr seq start -> seq (PREFIX) < (TEMPLATE) < ___ ___ (SUFFIX) [ ] < > ( ) Fill in the 2 blanks (___) so that PREFIX + filled-TEMPLATE + SUFFIX is a grammatical sentence. Answer with the blank tokens in order, space-...
> >
{"g": "seq -> \nexpr -> '[' seq ']'\nexpr -> '(' seq ')'\nexpr -> '<' seq '>'\nseq -> expr seq\nstart -> seq", "start": "start", "k": 3, "prefix": ["<"], "suffix": ["[", "]", "<", ">", "(", ")"], "hints": {"0": "<"}, "template": "< ___ ___", "blanks": [1, 2], "n_blanks": 2, "n_hints": 1, "n_options": 6, "_time": 0.0623...
null
3
instruct
arithmetics
Evaluate lcm(7, 59) + abs(12) + -4.60. The answer is a number.
420.4
{"expr": "lcm(7, 59) + abs(12) + -4.60", "display_expr": "lcm(7, 59) + abs(12) + -4.60", "digit_mode": "normal", "semantics": "exact", "semantic_cue": false, "out_decimals": 3, "height": 5, "cot": "lcm(7, 59) = 413\nabs(12) = 12\n413 + 12 = 425\n425 + -4.6 = 420.4", "_time": 0.0016937255859375, "_task": "arithmetics", ...
null
0
instruct
planning
Objects: object_1, object_2, object_3, object_4 Actions: action_0(x0, x1) Effect: fluent_2(x1, x0) action_3(x0, x1) Requires: fluent_2(x1, x0), fluent_0(x0) Effect: fluent_5(x0), fluent_1(x1, x0) Initial state: True values: fluent_0(object_4) All facts not listed under True values are false. Goal: fluent_1(obj...
action_0(object_4, object_1) action_0(object_4, object_4) action_0(object_4, object_2) action_0(object_3, object_3) action_3(object_4, object_2)
{"domain_seed": "8-280", "fluent_arity": 2, "na": 5, "planted_na": 5, "optimality_gap": 0, "target_na": 5, "generator_mode": "planted_walk_optimal", "trim_mode": "plan_cone", "problem_english": "Objects:\nobject_1, object_2, object_3, object_4\n\nActions:\naction_0(x0, x1)\n Effect: fluent_2(x1, x0)\naction_3(x0, x1)\...
null
4
instruct
metamath_entailment
Does the conjecture follow using only the listed premises and rules? Rules instantiate only by renaming variables. The answer is True or False. Premises: 1. ctx => P2(F1(x, C2), D1) 2. ctx => P2(x, D2) 3. ctx => P2(x, D3) 4. ctx => P2(F2(x), D4) 5. ctx => P3(C0, x) 6. ctx => P4(x, C0) 7. ctx => P2(x, D5) 8. ctx => P5(...
False
{"premises": ["ctx => P2(F1(x, C2), D1)", "ctx => P2(x, D2)", "ctx => P2(x, D3)", "ctx => P2(F2(x), D4)", "ctx => P3(C0, x)", "ctx => P4(x, C0)", "ctx => P2(x, D5)", "ctx => P5(y, C0)"], "raw_premises": [["|-", "(", "ph", "->", "(", "A", "^", "2", ")", "e.", "ZZ", ")"], ["|-", "(", "ph", "->", "A", "e.", "QQ", ")"], ["...
null
2
instruct
graph_successors
For each query (x, k), give the k-th successor of x by following directed edges k times. Answer with space-separated integers in query order. Graph: Nodes [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] and directed edges: (0, 4), (1, 6), (2, 7), (3, 1), (4, 2), (5, 0), (6, 5), (7, 3). Queries: [(2, 3), (0, 4)] Answer: 1 3 For each query ...
3 6
{"graph_description": "Directed Edges: 0->3, 1->7, 2->5, 3->1, 4->0, 5->4, 6->6, 7->2", "queries": [[0, 1], [6, 4]], "payload": {"graph": "Directed Edges: 0->3, 1->7, 2->5, 3->1, 4->0, 5->4, 6->6, 7->2", "queries": "[(0, 1), (6, 4)]"}, "nodes": [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7], "edges": [[0, 3], [1, 7], [2, 5], [3, 1], [4, 0],...
null
2
few_shot
most_probable_evidence
Factor d is independently true with probability 0.1. Factor f is independently true with probability 0.3. Factor b is independently true with probability 0.7. The observation holds exactly when ((factor d or factor f) holds and factor b is false). We observe it. Which hidden fact values form the most probable complete ...
1 3 4
{"problog": "0.1::d.\n0.3::f.\n0.7::b.\nobserved :- ((d;f),\\+b).\nevidence(observed,true).", "english": "Factor d is independently true with probability 0.1.\nFactor f is independently true with probability 0.3.\nFactor b is independently true with probability 0.7.\nThe observation holds exactly when ((factor d or fac...
null
1
instruct
constrained_continuation
(START) start (GRAMMAR) expr -> '(' seq ')' start -> seq seq -> expr -> '<' seq '>' seq -> expr seq expr -> '[' seq ']' (PREFIX) <empty> (TEMPLATE) ___ > ___ > (SUFFIX) <empty> Fill in the 2 blanks (___) so that PREFIX + filled-TEMPLATE + SUFFIX is a grammatical sentence. Answer with the blank tokens in order, sp...
< <
{"g": "expr -> '(' seq ')'\nstart -> seq\nseq -> \nexpr -> '<' seq '>'\nseq -> expr seq\nexpr -> '[' seq ']'", "start": "start", "k": 4, "prefix": [], "suffix": [], "hints": {"1": ">", "3": ">"}, "template": "___ > ___ >", "blanks": [0, 2], "n_blanks": 2, "n_hints": 2, "n_options": 18, "_time": 0.0758662223815918, "_ta...
null
1
instruct
program_synthesis
Write f(s: str) -> str. Target: return the minimum-cost StringFrag-v1 expression matching the examples. Always allowed: s, string literals "", " ", "-", "_", and integer literals 0, 1, 2, 3. Allowed operators for this problem: - replace1: str.replace(str, str, 1) - find: str.find(str) - eq_str: str == str Bounds: str...
def f(s: str) -> str: return s.replace("_", "-", 1)
{"dsl": "StringFrag-v1", "cost": "nodes,ops,source_len,source_lex", "max_nodes": 11, "io_pairs": [[" abc", " abc"], ["__", "-_"]], "examples": [[" abc", " abc"], ["__", "-_"]], "holdout": [["", ""], [" ", " "], ["-", "-"], ["_", "-"], ["a", "a"], ["aa", "aa"], ["ab", "ab"], ["a-b", "a-b"], ["a_b", "a-b"], ["abc", "abc"...
null
1
instruct
planning
Objects: object_1, object_2, object_3, object_4, object_5 Actions: action_0(x0, x1) Requires: fluent_0(x1, x0), fluent_0(x0, x1) Effect: not fluent_3 action_1(x0, x1) Requires: fluent_4 Effect: fluent_2(x0) action_2(x0, x1) Requires: fluent_1(x0, x1), fluent_0(x0, x1), fluent_5 Effect: fluent_4, not fluent...
action_1(object_1, object_2) action_1(object_4, object_2) action_4(object_2, object_1) action_1(object_2, object_2) action_4(object_1, object_2) action_4(object_4, object_4)
{"domain_seed": "7-311", "fluent_arity": 2, "na": 6, "planted_na": 6, "optimality_gap": 0, "target_na": 5, "generator_mode": "planted_walk_optimal", "trim_mode": "full", "problem_english": "Objects:\nobject_1, object_2, object_3, object_4, object_5\n\nActions:\naction_0(x0, x1)\n Requires: fluent_0(x1, x0), fluent_0(x...
null
3
instruct
planar_geometry_relations
Given points: N=(3, -2); O=(-2, -3); Q=(5/9, 23/9); R=(-1, -1); S=(1/9, 31/9); W=(-3, -4); Z=(4, -3). Definitions: J is the 90-degree counterclockwise rotation of W about R. K is the 90-degree counterclockwise rotation of N about R. Question: What type of angle is angle SKQ? Answer is one of: acute, right, obtuse.
obtuse
{"points": {"N": "(3, -2)", "O": "(-2, -3)", "Q": "(5/9, 23/9)", "R": "(-1, -1)", "S": "(1/9, 31/9)", "W": "(-3, -4)", "Z": "(4, -3)"}, "definitions": ["J is the 90-degree counterclockwise rotation of W about R.", "K is the 90-degree counterclockwise rotation of N about R."], "query": "What type of angle is angle SKQ?"...
null
0
instruct
analogical_case_matching
Which case matches Query under consistent entity/relation renaming and per-relation direction reversal? Answer with its ID. M0: a beta b, b beta c, c beta a, d beta a M1: b alpha a, b alpha c, c alpha d, a beta d M2: b alpha d, c alpha a, d alpha c, c beta b M3: e alpha b, a beta c, c beta d, e beta f Query: u delta z...
M2
{"cases": [{"id": "M0", "context": [["beta", "a", "b"], ["beta", "b", "c"], ["beta", "c", "a"], ["beta", "d", "a"]], "consequence": ["beta", "a", "d"]}, {"id": "M1", "context": [["alpha", "b", "a"], ["alpha", "b", "c"], ["alpha", "c", "d"], ["beta", "a", "d"]], "consequence": ["alpha", "a", "b"]}, {"id": "M2", "context...
null
1
instruct
grid_navigation
Grid [0,8]x[0,8], N=+y, E=+x. Initial Facts: - E is left of A. - A is right of F. - F starts at (1, 5). - A is left of G. - F is left of B. - B is right of E. - A is in the same column as D. - G is below D. - B is left of C. - F is above E. - E is in the same column as F. Steps: 1. G jumps to B's position offset by (1...
(aligned, above)
{"answer_type": "relation", "query_a": "A", "query_b": "F", "grid": 8, "objects": ["A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G"], "facts": [{"k": "h", "a": "E", "b": "A", "r": "left"}, {"k": "h", "a": "A", "b": "F", "r": "right"}, {"k": "coord", "a": "F", "p": [1, 5]}, {"k": "h", "a": "A", "b": "G", "r": "left"}, {"k": "h", "a": ...
null
4
instruct
belief_tracking
Initially, everyone knows that the coin is in the tray. Story: Heidi moves the coin to the tray. No one else sees the move. Dave sends Carol the message "I think the coin is in the tray", but it is not delivered. Dave moves the coin to the tray. Unknown to the others, Carol watches through a window. Dave moves the coi...
tray
{"agents": ["Carol", "Dave", "Heidi"], "objects": ["coin"], "containers": ["vase", "jar", "tray"], "init": {"loc": {"coin": "tray"}}, "specs": [{"kind": "move", "actor": "Heidi", "target": null, "policy": null, "report_type": null, "scene": "private_observation", "object": "coin", "destination": "tray", "observers": []...
null
1
instruct
code_runnability
Predict whether this Python call runs successfully or raises an exception. ```python def f0(r: list, j: int) -> int: j *= (4 if 2 * j > False else j) j *= 3 j = j * 3 j += f1(j) j = r.index(j) return j + 3 def f1(b: int) -> int: b += b return b * 9 def f2(w: str, c: str) -> list: pri...
ValueError
{"code": "def f0(r: list, j: int) -> int:\n j *= (4 if 2 * j > False else j)\n j *= 3\n j = j * 3\n j += f1(j)\n j = r.index(j)\n return j + 3\ndef f1(b: int) -> int:\n b += b\n return b * 9\ndef f2(w: str, c: str) -> list:\n print(c)\n return []\ndef endpoint(x0: list, x1: int) -> int:\n ...
null
1
instruct
graph_successors
For each query (x, k), give the k-th successor of x by following directed edges k times. Answer with space-separated integers in query order. Graph: Nodes: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] Adjacency Matrix (row indicates source, column indicates target): [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0] [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] [0, 0, 0, 0, ...
5 8
{"graph_description": "Nodes: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]\nAdjacency Matrix (row indicates source, column indicates target):\n[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]\n[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]\n[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]\n[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]\n[0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]\n[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]\n[1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0...
null
3
instruct
equation_system
Solve the following system of equations for the variable 'X1'. System: X1 + X2 - 25 = 0 -6*X1 - 7*X2 + 166 = 0 2*X1 + 3*X2 - 66 = 0 The answer is the value of X1, or 'No solution' / 'Multiple solutions'.
9
{"equations": ["X1 + X2 - 25 = 0", "-6*X1 - 7*X2 + 166 = 0", "2*X1 + 3*X2 - 66 = 0"], "query_variable": "X1", "full_solution_map": {"X1": 9, "X2": 16}, "case": "unique", "cot": "1. Forward:\nR2 -= -6*R1\nR3 -= 2*R1\nR3 -= -1*R2\n\n2. Backward:\nX2 = 16\nX1 = 9", "_time": 0.027585744857788086, "_task": "equation_system"...
null
0
instruct
set_missing_element
Answer with the missing elements in the ordered span of [610, 614, 613, 615, 612] as a Python set.
{611}
{"element_list": [610, 614, 613, 615, 612], "missing_count": 1, "_time": 0.0009310245513916016, "_task": "set_missing_element", "_level": 0, "_config": {"level": 0, "seed": null, "size": null, "domain_size": 200, "set_size": 6, "n_domains": 2, "prob_no_missing": 0.1}, "_prompt_tokens": 30, "_answer_tokens": 3, "_genera...
null
0
instruct
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Procedural Pile: verifiable procedural data optimized for transferability

Task gallery · Source · Paper · RLVR dataset

Procedural Pile is a synthetic corpus of verifiable reasoning problems generated by Reasoning Core. It is intended for continued pretraining, mid-training, and supervised fine-tuning.

Answers come from procedural generators and task-specific solvers or checkers, rather than language-model generation. The corpus spans mathematics, formal logic, planning, graphs, parsing, code, structured data, and other symbolic domains. Difficulty is controlled continuously within each task.

Reasoning Core is optimized for transferability: task selection and difficulty ranges are guided by reproducible measurements of transfer, solvability, and shortcut resistance.


Load

from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset("reasoning-core/procedural-pile")

No configuration name is required. The dataset provides train and test splits.

Dataset structure

Field Description
task Reasoning task identifier
prompt Model input
answer Canonical target answer
metadata JSON-encoded generation and validation metadata
level Difficulty level
mode instruct, few_shot, or verification

Most examples use direct instruction format. A smaller share adds one in-context demonstration or asks the model to verify a candidate answer.


Task catalogue

The corpus currently contains 50 task families. The task gallery includes a worked example for each one.

Area Tasks
Mathematics & formal methods · 10 arithmetics · math_word_problem · equation_system · combinatorics_formula_selection · planar_geometry_relations · lean_candidate_compilation · lean_missing_line · metamath_core_select · metamath_entailment · sequential_induction
Logic & inference · 10 logic_formalization · logic_nli · logic_qa · defeasible_nli · multistep_nli · multistep_abduction · multistep_evidence_retrieval · qualitative_reasoning · qualitative_causal_reasoning · belief_tracking
Symbolic transformations · 7 lambda_reduction · rewrite_system · unification_entailment · set_expression · set_missing_element · string_transduction · analogical_case_matching
Planning, state & graphs · 7 planning · constraint_satisfaction · grid_navigation · reference_tracking · coreference · graph_pathfinding · graph_successors
Language & formal languages · 5 parsing_derivation · regex_following · regex_reasoning · constrained_continuation · syntax_error_detection
Structured data & code · 7 table_qa · table_equivalence · table_statistics · code_analysis · code_execution · code_runnability · program_synthesis
Games & probability · 4 game_best_move · game_forced_win · most_probable_evidence · most_probable_outcome

Citation

@article{reasoningcore2026,
  title   = {Reasoning Core: A Scalable Procedural Data Generation Suite for Symbolic Pre-training and Post-Training},
  author  = {Lacombe, Valentin and Quesnel, Valentin and Sileo, Damien},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02208},
  year    = {2026},
  url     = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02208}
}
Downloads last month
2,731

Collection including reasoning-core/procedural-pile

Papers for reasoning-core/procedural-pile